EconologyResearch Foundation
Multi-Scale Pattern Prediction and Recognition Architecture (MIP-Series)
Lead Investigator: Hooshmand M. Kalayeh, PhD
Dataset Field Track: Purdue University Agronomy Farm (AVIRIS Indian Pines)
Registry Code: mip015_report_FP20261016_0853.html | Date: October 16, 2026
Economic X-Ray Systems & Data Diagnostics
High-Dimensional Parallel Performance Matrix Summary

The statistical comparative analysis below documents the cross-sectional classification accuracies achieved by the MIP-015 Linear Subspace Transformation Matrix against the MIP-014 Multi-Modular Non-Linear Parallel Compression Engine.

Class ID Ground-Truth Class Name Total Labeled Pixels MIP-015 PCA Accuracy (%) MIP-014 Non-Linear Accuracy (%)
1Alfalfa4682.691.3
2Corn-notill142884.293.8
3Corn-mintill83081.592.1
4Corn23789.094.5
5Grass-pasture48391.395.2
6Grass-trees74794.898.1
7Grass-pasture-mowed2878.585.7
8Hay-windrowed47897.999.4
9Oats2075.080.0
10Soybean-notill97280.491.6
11Soybean-mintill245586.194.3
12Soybean-clean59383.792.9
13Wheat20596.598.5
14Woods126595.198.9
15Buildings-Grass-Trees-Drives38688.394.8
16Stone-Steel-Towers9392.496.7
Subspace Variance Analysis
Figure 1: MIP-015 Orthogonal Subspace Variance Distribution Matrix
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 16 18 20 Extracted Subspace Component Index 0.0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 Explained Variance Ratio